Custom Workflows

Master this essential documentation concept

Quick Definition

Automated processes tailored to specific business needs that guide documents through predefined steps like review, approval, and publication

How Custom Workflows Works

flowchart TD A[Content Created] --> B{Content Type?} B -->|Technical Doc| C[Technical Review] B -->|Marketing Content| D[Brand Review] B -->|Policy Document| E[Legal Review] C --> F[Subject Matter Expert] D --> G[Marketing Manager] E --> H[Compliance Officer] F --> I{Approved?} G --> J{Approved?} H --> K{Approved?} I -->|Yes| L[Final Editor Review] I -->|No| M[Return to Author] J -->|Yes| L J -->|No| M K -->|Yes| L K -->|No| M L --> N{Final Approval?} N -->|Yes| O[Publish Content] N -->|No| M M --> A O --> P[Notify Stakeholders]

Understanding Custom Workflows

Custom Workflows represent a powerful feature in modern documentation platforms that allows organizations to create tailored business processes matching their specific operational requirements. These configurable systems automate content management tasks while maintaining organizational standards and approval hierarchies.

Key Features

  • Configurable approval chains with multiple reviewers and stakeholders
  • Automated notifications and task assignments based on content status
  • Conditional logic that routes content based on type, department, or sensitivity
  • Integration capabilities with existing business tools and systems
  • Version control and audit trails for compliance tracking
  • Customizable status labels and progress indicators

Benefits for Documentation Teams

  • Reduced manual coordination and follow-up tasks
  • Consistent quality control through standardized review processes
  • Faster content publishing with streamlined approval cycles
  • Improved accountability with clear ownership and deadlines
  • Enhanced compliance through documented approval trails
  • Better resource allocation with automated task distribution

Common Misconceptions

  • Custom Workflows are only useful for large organizations with complex hierarchies
  • Implementation requires extensive technical knowledge or coding skills
  • Workflows slow down content creation by adding bureaucratic layers
  • Once configured, workflows cannot be easily modified or updated

Streamlining Custom Workflows with Video Documentation

When designing and implementing custom workflows for your business processes, teams often capture the details in training videos or recorded meetings. These videos demonstrate the step-by-step procedures, approval paths, and automation triggers that make your workflows effective. However, relying solely on video recordings creates significant hurdles for teams trying to reference or modify these custom workflows later.

Videos containing workflow specifications are time-consuming to navigate—forcing team members to scrub through lengthy recordings to find specific configuration details or decision points. This inefficiency becomes particularly problematic when onboarding new team members or when workflows need quick adjustments.

Converting your video-based custom workflow knowledge into searchable documentation solves these challenges. By transforming recordings into structured text, you create easily referenced documentation that clearly outlines each step of your custom workflows. Team members can quickly search for specific triggers, conditions, or approval steps without watching entire videos. Additionally, your documentation becomes a living resource that's much easier to update as your custom workflows evolve over time.

Discover how to transform your video-recorded custom workflows into accessible, searchable documentation →

Real-World Documentation Use Cases

API Documentation Review Process

Problem

Technical documentation requires validation from multiple teams including developers, product managers, and technical writers, leading to coordination challenges and delayed releases.

Solution

Implement a Custom Workflow that automatically routes API documentation through sequential reviews based on content tags and project categories.

Implementation

1. Configure workflow triggers for API documentation tags 2. Set up sequential review stages: Developer → Product Manager → Technical Writer → Documentation Lead 3. Add automated notifications with 48-hour response deadlines 4. Include conditional paths for urgent releases 5. Set up final publishing approval gate

Expected Outcome

Reduced API documentation review time by 60% while maintaining quality standards and ensuring all stakeholders provide input before publication.

Compliance Document Management

Problem

Regulatory documents require strict approval processes with audit trails, but manual tracking leads to compliance risks and missed deadlines.

Solution

Create a Custom Workflow specifically for compliance documentation with mandatory legal review, version control, and automated audit logging.

Implementation

1. Design workflow with mandatory legal team review stage 2. Configure automatic version archiving at each approval step 3. Set up compliance officer as final approver 4. Add automated deadline reminders 5. Integrate audit trail exports for regulatory reporting

Expected Outcome

Achieved 100% compliance documentation approval tracking with complete audit trails and eliminated missed regulatory deadlines.

Multi-Language Content Localization

Problem

Translating documentation across multiple languages requires coordination between writers, translators, and regional reviewers, causing bottlenecks and inconsistencies.

Solution

Establish a Custom Workflow that manages the entire localization pipeline from source content approval to translated content publication.

Implementation

1. Create master workflow for source content approval 2. Configure automatic translation assignment based on target languages 3. Set up regional reviewer assignments by language/geography 4. Add quality assurance checkpoints for translation accuracy 5. Implement synchronized publishing across all language versions

Expected Outcome

Streamlined localization process reduced translation delays by 45% and improved consistency across 12 language versions.

Emergency Documentation Updates

Problem

Critical system outages or security incidents require immediate documentation updates, but standard approval processes are too slow for urgent situations.

Solution

Design an expedited Custom Workflow for emergency documentation that maintains quality control while enabling rapid publication.

Implementation

1. Create emergency workflow trigger for critical updates 2. Configure parallel review process instead of sequential 3. Set up SMS/Slack notifications for immediate attention 4. Add post-publication review stage for quality assurance 5. Implement automatic escalation if reviewers don't respond within 30 minutes

Expected Outcome

Reduced emergency documentation update time from 4 hours to 30 minutes while maintaining approval oversight and quality standards.

Best Practices

✓ Start Simple and Iterate

Begin with basic workflows and gradually add complexity as your team becomes comfortable with the system and identifies specific needs.

✓ Do: Start with a simple linear approval process for one content type, gather feedback from users, and incrementally add features like conditional routing or parallel reviews.
✗ Don't: Don't try to replicate every possible scenario in your initial workflow design, as this leads to overly complex systems that users will avoid or misuse.

✓ Map Existing Processes First

Document your current approval and review processes before designing Custom Workflows to ensure you're solving real problems rather than creating new ones.

✓ Do: Interview stakeholders, document current pain points, identify bottlenecks, and map out ideal process flows before configuring any workflows.
✗ Don't: Don't assume you know how content currently flows through your organization without validating with actual users and reviewing historical approval patterns.

✓ Build in Flexibility and Escape Routes

Design workflows with alternative paths and override capabilities to handle exceptions and urgent situations that don't fit standard processes.

✓ Do: Include emergency bypass options, escalation paths for stalled reviews, and the ability to modify workflows without breaking in-progress content.
✗ Don't: Don't create rigid workflows that force users to work around the system or abandon it entirely when facing time-sensitive or unusual circumstances.

✓ Set Clear Deadlines and Accountability

Establish specific timeframes for each workflow stage and implement automated reminders to prevent content from stalling in review queues.

✓ Do: Define realistic SLAs for each review stage, send automated reminders at 24 and 48 hours, and escalate to managers after deadline breaches.
✗ Don't: Don't create workflows without time limits or accountability measures, as this often results in content sitting indefinitely in review queues.

✓ Monitor and Optimize Performance

Regularly analyze workflow metrics to identify bottlenecks, measure efficiency improvements, and optimize processes based on actual usage data.

✓ Do: Track metrics like average approval time, bottleneck stages, user adoption rates, and content quality scores to continuously improve workflow design.
✗ Don't: Don't set up workflows and forget about them; failing to monitor performance means missing opportunities to optimize and improve user experience.

How Docsie Helps with Custom Workflows

See How Docsie Can Help

Build Better Documentation with Docsie

Join thousands of teams creating outstanding documentation

Start Free Trial