Permission Settings

Master this essential documentation concept

Quick Definition

Access control features that determine which users can view, edit, or share specific documents or sections of a platform

How Permission Settings Works

graph TD A[Documentation Platform] --> B[Permission Settings] B --> C[Role Assignment] B --> D[Access Levels] B --> E[Content Restrictions] C --> F[Admin] C --> G[Editor] C --> H[Reviewer] C --> I[Viewer] D --> J[Full Access] D --> K[Edit Only] D --> L[Comment Only] D --> M[Read Only] E --> N[Document Level] E --> O[Section Level] E --> P[Project Level] F --> J G --> K H --> L I --> M N --> Q[Individual Docs] O --> R[Specific Sections] P --> S[Entire Projects] Q --> T[User Access] R --> T S --> T T --> U[Secure Documentation]

Understanding Permission Settings

Permission Settings form the backbone of secure documentation management, enabling teams to control who can access, modify, or distribute specific content within their documentation ecosystem. These access control mechanisms ensure that sensitive information remains protected while facilitating seamless collaboration among authorized team members.

Key Features

  • Role-based access control (RBAC) with predefined user roles like admin, editor, reviewer, and viewer
  • Granular permissions at document, section, or even paragraph levels
  • Time-based access controls with expiration dates for temporary permissions
  • Group-based permissions for department or project-specific access
  • Inheritance settings that automatically apply parent-level permissions to child documents
  • Audit trails tracking permission changes and access attempts

Benefits for Documentation Teams

  • Enhanced security through controlled access to confidential documentation
  • Streamlined collaboration by ensuring the right people have appropriate access levels
  • Reduced risk of accidental content modifications or deletions
  • Compliance support for regulatory requirements and internal policies
  • Improved workflow efficiency through automated permission management
  • Better content governance and version control

Common Misconceptions

  • Permission settings slow down collaboration - properly configured permissions actually enhance productivity
  • Only large organizations need complex permission structures - even small teams benefit from basic access controls
  • Once set, permissions don't need regular review - permissions should be audited and updated regularly
  • All team members need the same access level - different roles require different permission levels for optimal security

Managing Permission Settings Across Video Training and Documentation

Technical teams often create detailed video walkthroughs showing how to configure permission settings in software platforms. These videos capture the nuanced decision-making around which user roles should access specific features, demonstrating the UI paths for setting up these critical access controls.

However, when knowledge about permission settings exists only in video format, teams face significant challenges. A 45-minute training video might contain just 3 minutes about configuring specific permission settings, making it difficult for team members to quickly reference this information when setting up access controls for new projects or users. Additionally, updating permission setting guidance requires re-recording entire videos, creating version control problems.

Converting these videos into searchable documentation transforms how your team manages permission settings knowledge. When extracted into documentation, complex permission matrices become easily scannable tables. Step-by-step permission configuration processes become clear, numbered instructions. Most importantly, your team can quickly find, reference, and update specific permission settings information without scrubbing through lengthy recordings.

Learn how to transform your video training on permission settings into actionable, searchable documentation →

Real-World Documentation Use Cases

Confidential Product Documentation Access Control

Problem

A software company needs to share product specifications with internal teams while preventing external contractors from accessing sensitive competitive information and ensuring compliance with NDAs.

Solution

Implement tiered permission settings with role-based access controls that separate internal employees from external contractors, with document-level restrictions on confidential materials.

Implementation

1. Create user groups for 'Internal Staff' and 'External Contractors' 2. Set up document categories with different permission levels 3. Apply 'Full Access' permissions to internal staff for all documents 4. Restrict contractor access to specific project folders only 5. Enable audit logging to track access attempts 6. Set up automated permission reviews quarterly

Expected Outcome

Sensitive information remains secure while maintaining productive collaboration, with full audit trails for compliance reporting and reduced risk of information leaks.

Multi-Department Knowledge Base Management

Problem

A large organization struggles with different departments accidentally modifying or deleting each other's documentation, leading to confusion and lost information across teams.

Solution

Establish department-specific permission zones with edit rights limited to content owners while maintaining organization-wide read access for knowledge sharing.

Implementation

1. Map organizational structure to permission groups 2. Assign department-specific edit permissions to respective teams 3. Grant read-only access to all departments for cross-functional knowledge 4. Set up approval workflows for cross-department content changes 5. Implement version control with rollback permissions for department leads 6. Create shared spaces with collaborative editing for cross-team projects

Expected Outcome

Each department maintains control over their content while benefiting from organization-wide knowledge sharing, with reduced conflicts and improved content integrity.

Client Documentation Portal with Tiered Access

Problem

A consulting firm needs to provide clients with access to their project documentation while ensuring each client only sees their own materials and preventing access to proprietary methodologies.

Solution

Create client-specific permission boundaries with automated access provisioning based on project assignments and contract terms, including time-based access controls.

Implementation

1. Set up client-specific user groups linked to project codes 2. Configure automatic permission assignment based on project participation 3. Implement time-based access that expires with contract completion 4. Create template permission sets for different service tiers 5. Set up client admin roles for managing their team's access 6. Enable secure sharing links with expiration dates

Expected Outcome

Clients receive appropriate access to their documentation while proprietary information remains protected, with automated management reducing administrative overhead.

Progressive Documentation Review Process

Problem

A technical writing team needs to manage a complex review process where different stakeholders review documents at different stages, but reviewers shouldn't see each other's comments until the final review phase.

Solution

Implement stage-based permission settings that progressively reveal content and comments as documents move through the review workflow, with role-specific visibility controls.

Implementation

1. Define review stages with corresponding permission levels 2. Set up reviewer roles with stage-specific access rights 3. Configure comment visibility based on review phase 4. Implement workflow triggers that automatically adjust permissions 5. Create reviewer-specific views that hide other reviewers' feedback 6. Set up final review stage with full visibility for consolidation

Expected Outcome

Reviews proceed efficiently without bias from previous feedback, while maintaining proper oversight and final consolidation of all input for comprehensive document improvement.

Best Practices

✓ Implement the Principle of Least Privilege

Grant users the minimum level of access required to perform their specific job functions, starting with restrictive permissions and expanding as needed rather than starting with broad access and restricting later.

✓ Do: Begin with read-only access for new users and gradually increase permissions based on demonstrated need and role requirements. Regularly audit user permissions to ensure they align with current responsibilities.
✗ Don't: Don't grant administrative or full edit access by default, and avoid giving permanent high-level permissions for temporary project needs without setting expiration dates.

✓ Establish Clear Role-Based Permission Hierarchies

Create well-defined user roles that align with organizational structure and documentation workflows, ensuring each role has appropriate permissions for their responsibilities without overlap or gaps.

✓ Do: Define roles based on actual job functions and documentation needs. Create role templates that can be easily applied to new users and document the permissions associated with each role.
✗ Don't: Don't create too many granular roles that become difficult to manage, and avoid assigning multiple conflicting roles to the same user that could create security vulnerabilities.

✓ Conduct Regular Permission Audits and Reviews

Systematically review user permissions on a scheduled basis to ensure access rights remain appropriate as roles change, projects end, and organizational needs evolve.

✓ Do: Schedule quarterly permission reviews, maintain logs of permission changes, and implement automated alerts for unusual access patterns. Remove permissions for inactive users promptly.
✗ Don't: Don't assume permissions remain appropriate indefinitely, and avoid manual-only permission tracking that can lead to oversight gaps and security risks.

✓ Use Group-Based Permissions for Scalability

Organize users into logical groups based on departments, projects, or functions, then assign permissions to groups rather than individual users to simplify management and ensure consistency.

✓ Do: Create groups that reflect your organizational structure and project teams. Use nested groups for complex hierarchies and automate group membership based on HR systems when possible.
✗ Don't: Don't rely solely on individual user permissions that become unmanageable at scale, and avoid creating groups that are too broad and compromise security principles.

✓ Document Permission Policies and Provide Training

Maintain clear documentation of permission policies, procedures, and escalation paths, while providing regular training to users and administrators on proper permission management practices.

✓ Do: Create accessible guides for requesting permission changes, document approval workflows, and provide examples of appropriate permission levels for different scenarios.
✗ Don't: Don't assume users understand permission implications without training, and avoid undocumented permission policies that lead to inconsistent application and security gaps.

How Docsie Helps with Permission Settings

See How Docsie Can Help

Build Better Documentation with Docsie

Join thousands of teams creating outstanding documentation

Start Free Trial