User Testing

Master this essential documentation concept

Quick Definition

The process of evaluating a product by testing it with real users to identify usability issues and gather feedback

How User Testing Works

flowchart TD A[Define Testing Goals] --> B[Recruit Target Users] B --> C[Create Task Scenarios] C --> D[Prepare Documentation] D --> E[Conduct Testing Session] E --> F[User Attempts Task] F --> G{Task Completed?} G -->|Yes| H[Record Success Path] G -->|No| I[Document Pain Points] H --> J[Gather Feedback] I --> J J --> K[Analyze Results] K --> L[Identify Issues] L --> M[Prioritize Improvements] M --> N[Update Documentation] N --> O{More Testing Needed?} O -->|Yes| E O -->|No| P[Deploy Improved Docs] P --> Q[Monitor Performance]

Understanding User Testing

User Testing is a critical methodology that transforms documentation from assumptions into evidence-based content by observing how real users interact with your materials. This systematic approach reveals the gap between what documentation teams think users need and what users actually experience when trying to accomplish their goals.

Key Features

  • Direct observation of user behavior while navigating documentation
  • Task-based scenarios that mirror real-world use cases
  • Collection of both quantitative metrics (time to completion, success rates) and qualitative feedback
  • Identification of pain points, confusion areas, and content gaps
  • Iterative testing cycles to validate improvements
  • Multiple testing methods including moderated sessions, unmoderated remote testing, and guerrilla testing

Benefits for Documentation Teams

  • Reduces support ticket volume by identifying and fixing common user struggles
  • Increases user satisfaction and task completion rates
  • Provides objective data to support content decisions and resource allocation
  • Reveals assumptions about user knowledge and behavior that may be incorrect
  • Improves information architecture and content organization
  • Validates the effectiveness of new content before full deployment

Common Misconceptions

  • User testing is too expensive or time-consuming for documentation teams
  • Internal team members can adequately represent end users
  • User feedback through surveys is equivalent to observing actual behavior
  • Testing is only needed for major releases or complete rewrites
  • Perfect documentation doesn't need testing because it's comprehensive

Enhancing User Testing Insights Through Structured Documentation

When conducting user testing, your team likely captures valuable observations, participant feedback, and usability insights through recorded sessions and demo videos. These recordings contain crucial information about how real users interact with your product and where they encounter difficulties.

However, relying solely on video recordings creates significant challenges for your user testing workflow. Important findings remain trapped in hours of footage, making it difficult to quickly reference specific usability issues, share insights with developers, or track patterns across multiple testing sessions. When stakeholders need to understand key user testing results, scanning through lengthy videos becomes impractical.

Converting your user testing videos into structured documentation transforms these scattered insights into accessible knowledge. By extracting key observations, categorizing usability issues, and documenting user feedback in searchable formats, you create a usability knowledge base that teams can easily reference. This documentation approach helps prioritize fixes, track improvements over time, and ensure that user testing insights directly influence product development.

For example, instead of repeatedly reviewing a two-hour testing session to recall a navigation issue, your team can consult a well-organized user testing report with timestamped references to the original video evidence when needed.

Learn how to transform your user testing videos into actionable documentation →

Real-World Documentation Use Cases

API Documentation Usability Testing

Problem

Developers struggle to implement API endpoints despite comprehensive technical documentation, leading to high support ticket volume and delayed integrations.

Solution

Conduct task-based user testing with developers attempting to complete common integration scenarios using only the documentation.

Implementation

1. Recruit 5-8 developers with varying experience levels 2. Create realistic scenarios like 'authenticate and make your first API call' 3. Observe users screen-sharing while working through tasks 4. Record where they get stuck, what they skip, and what they search for 5. Interview participants about their mental models and expectations

Expected Outcome

Identification of missing code examples, unclear authentication steps, and assumption gaps, resulting in 40% reduction in API support tickets and faster developer onboarding.

Knowledge Base Navigation Testing

Problem

Users frequently contact support for information that exists in the knowledge base, indicating discoverability and usability issues with the self-service content.

Solution

Test how users naturally search for and navigate to solutions for common problems using the existing knowledge base structure.

Implementation

1. Identify top 10 support ticket categories 2. Create scenarios based on these common issues 3. Ask users to find solutions using only the knowledge base 4. Track their search terms, navigation paths, and points of abandonment 5. Note when they would give up and contact support instead

Expected Outcome

Improved search functionality, better content categorization, and clearer article titles, leading to 30% increase in knowledge base self-service resolution rates.

Onboarding Documentation Flow Testing

Problem

New users have low completion rates for product setup and onboarding, with many abandoning the process midway through the documentation.

Solution

Observe new users completing the entire onboarding process from start to finish, identifying friction points and cognitive load issues.

Implementation

1. Recruit users who match new customer profiles 2. Create realistic onboarding scenarios with actual accounts/data 3. Use think-aloud protocol to understand user mental state 4. Track completion rates, time spent, and error recovery 5. Identify steps where users lose confidence or momentum

Expected Outcome

Streamlined onboarding flow with better progress indicators, reduced cognitive load, and 50% improvement in onboarding completion rates.

Mobile Documentation Experience Testing

Problem

Increasing mobile traffic to documentation shows high bounce rates and low task completion, suggesting mobile-specific usability issues.

Solution

Test documentation usability specifically on mobile devices with users in realistic mobile contexts and scenarios.

Implementation

1. Recruit users who primarily access documentation on mobile 2. Test in realistic environments (not just lab settings) 3. Focus on common mobile tasks like quick reference lookups 4. Observe touch interactions, scrolling behavior, and navigation patterns 5. Test both portrait and landscape orientations

Expected Outcome

Mobile-optimized content layout, improved touch targets, and condensed critical information, resulting in 35% improvement in mobile task completion rates.

Best Practices

✓ Test Early and Often with Small Groups

Conduct frequent testing sessions with 3-5 users rather than waiting for large-scale studies. Small groups reveal most usability issues while keeping costs and complexity manageable.

✓ Do: Schedule monthly testing sessions with different user segments, test prototypes and drafts before full publication, and create a regular testing calendar integrated with your content release cycle.
✗ Don't: Wait until documentation is 'perfect' to test, assume you need large sample sizes to get valuable insights, or skip testing because of time constraints.

✓ Focus on Real Tasks, Not Tours

Design testing scenarios around specific goals users want to accomplish, rather than asking them to generally explore or provide opinions about your documentation.

✓ Do: Create scenarios based on actual support tickets and user goals, give users realistic context and constraints, and observe natural behavior without excessive guidance.
✗ Don't: Ask users what they think about the documentation in general, guide them through a predetermined path, or use hypothetical scenarios that don't match real use cases.

✓ Recruit Your Actual User Base

Test with people who genuinely represent your documentation's intended audience, including their technical skill level, domain knowledge, and typical use contexts.

✓ Do: Use customer lists, community forums, and user research panels to find representative participants, screen for relevant experience and use cases, and include both novice and expert users.
✗ Don't: Test with internal team members, friends, or colleagues who have insider knowledge, assume all users have the same background, or skip user screening to save time.

✓ Observe Behavior Over Opinions

Pay more attention to what users actually do than what they say they would do. Actions reveal true usability issues while opinions can be influenced by politeness or incomplete recall.

✓ Do: Record screen activity and user navigation paths, note where users pause or show confusion, and track actual completion rates and error recovery patterns.
✗ Don't: Rely solely on post-session interviews, ask leading questions during tasks, or dismiss behavioral evidence in favor of user opinions about what they prefer.

✓ Create Actionable Testing Reports

Transform testing observations into specific, prioritized recommendations that your team can implement, with clear evidence linking problems to solutions.

✓ Do: Categorize findings by severity and frequency, provide specific examples with screenshots or quotes, and suggest concrete improvements with expected impact.
✗ Don't: Create lengthy reports that just describe what happened, make recommendations without supporting evidence, or fail to prioritize issues by business impact.

How Docsie Helps with User Testing

See How Docsie Can Help

Build Better Documentation with Docsie

Join thousands of teams creating outstanding documentation

Start Free Trial