WYSIWYG

Master this essential documentation concept

Quick Definition

What You See Is What You Get - an editor that allows users to see how content will appear in its final form while editing, without needing to know code.

How WYSIWYG Works

flowchart TD A[Writer Creates Content] --> B[WYSIWYG Editor] B --> C{Real-time Preview} C --> D[Visual Formatting] C --> E[Content Structure] C --> F[Media Integration] D --> G[Automatic Code Generation] E --> G F --> G G --> H[Published Documentation] I[Stakeholder Review] --> C J[Team Collaboration] --> B H --> K[End User Experience] K --> L{Feedback Loop} L --> A style B fill:#e1f5fe style C fill:#f3e5f5 style H fill:#e8f5e8

Understanding WYSIWYG

WYSIWYG editors revolutionize the documentation creation process by providing a visual editing environment where content appears exactly as it will in the final output. This approach bridges the gap between technical complexity and content creation, enabling documentation professionals to produce polished materials without coding expertise.

Key Features

  • Real-time visual formatting with immediate preview of changes
  • Intuitive toolbar with familiar word processor-style controls
  • Direct manipulation of text, images, and multimedia elements
  • Automatic code generation in the background
  • Support for tables, lists, headers, and complex layouts
  • Integration with collaborative editing and version control

Benefits for Documentation Teams

  • Reduced learning curve for non-technical writers
  • Faster content creation and iteration cycles
  • Consistent formatting across team members
  • Lower barrier to entry for subject matter experts
  • Immediate feedback on design and layout decisions
  • Streamlined review process with stakeholders

Common Misconceptions

  • WYSIWYG editors are less powerful than code-based solutions
  • Visual editors always produce bloated or inefficient code
  • Technical writers don't need WYSIWYG capabilities
  • WYSIWYG means sacrificing precise control over formatting

WYSIWYG Editors: From Video Demonstrations to Clear Documentation

When training teams on WYSIWYG editors, video demonstrations are invaluable for showing real-time interactions with the interface. Your product experts can record themselves creating content while explaining how the WYSIWYG editor allows users to format text, add images, and structure content exactly as it will appear in the final output.

However, when team members need to quickly reference specific WYSIWYG functions later, scrubbing through lengthy videos becomes inefficient. They might spend minutes searching for that one moment where you demonstrated how to create a complex table or embed a specific media type in your WYSIWYG editor.

Converting these video demonstrations into searchable documentation preserves the visual nature of WYSIWYG concepts while making them instantly accessible. Technical writers can transform recordings into step-by-step guides that include screenshots of the WYSIWYG interface at key moments, annotated with explanations. This documentation becomes especially valuable for complex WYSIWYG operations that require multiple steps or for highlighting lesser-known features that improve content creation efficiency.

Real-World Documentation Use Cases

Non-Technical SME Content Creation

Problem

Subject matter experts struggle to contribute to documentation due to complex markup languages and technical barriers, leading to knowledge gaps and delayed updates.

Solution

Implement WYSIWYG editors that allow SMEs to create and edit content using familiar word processor-like interfaces without learning markup syntax.

Implementation

1. Set up user accounts with appropriate permissions for SMEs 2. Provide basic training on the visual editor interface 3. Create templates for common content types 4. Establish a review workflow where technical writers can refine formatting 5. Enable collaborative editing for real-time feedback

Expected Outcome

Increased SME participation in documentation, faster knowledge capture, reduced bottlenecks in the content creation process, and more comprehensive documentation coverage.

Rapid Prototype Documentation

Problem

Product teams need to quickly create and iterate on documentation drafts during development cycles, but traditional markup-based workflows slow down the process.

Solution

Use WYSIWYG editors for rapid prototyping of documentation structure and content, allowing teams to visualize and refine information architecture quickly.

Implementation

1. Create wireframe-style documentation using visual editors 2. Focus on content structure and user flow rather than final formatting 3. Conduct stakeholder reviews using the visual preview 4. Iterate based on feedback without code changes 5. Finalize formatting and publish when content is approved

Expected Outcome

Accelerated documentation development cycles, improved stakeholder engagement in reviews, better alignment between product and documentation timelines.

Multi-Format Content Publishing

Problem

Documentation teams need to publish the same content across multiple formats (web, PDF, mobile) but maintaining consistency across different output types is challenging.

Solution

Leverage WYSIWYG editors with multi-format export capabilities to create content once and publish everywhere while maintaining visual consistency.

Implementation

1. Design content in the visual editor with responsive formatting 2. Use semantic styling rather than absolute formatting 3. Test preview across different output formats 4. Set up automated publishing workflows 5. Monitor output quality across all formats

Expected Outcome

Reduced content maintenance overhead, consistent user experience across platforms, streamlined publishing workflows, and improved content accessibility.

Collaborative Review Process

Problem

Stakeholder reviews are inefficient when reviewers can't visualize how content changes will appear in the final documentation, leading to multiple revision cycles.

Solution

Implement WYSIWYG editing with collaborative features that allow reviewers to see exactly how their suggested changes will appear in the published documentation.

Implementation

1. Share live preview links with stakeholders for review 2. Enable comment and suggestion features within the visual editor 3. Set up notification systems for review requests and responses 4. Use version comparison tools to highlight changes visually 5. Establish approval workflows with visual sign-off capabilities

Expected Outcome

Faster review cycles, reduced miscommunication about formatting and layout, improved stakeholder satisfaction, and higher quality final documentation.

Best Practices

Maintain Semantic Structure

Focus on using proper heading hierarchies and semantic elements rather than just visual formatting to ensure accessibility and SEO benefits.

✓ Do: Use built-in heading styles, lists, and structural elements provided by the WYSIWYG editor to create meaningful document structure
✗ Don't: Rely solely on manual font sizing and bold formatting to create visual hierarchy without proper semantic markup

Establish Style Guidelines

Create and enforce consistent style guidelines across your team to ensure uniformity in visual presentation and branding.

✓ Do: Develop custom style sheets and templates that team members can apply consistently through the WYSIWYG interface
✗ Don't: Allow each team member to create their own formatting standards, leading to inconsistent documentation appearance

Test Across Output Formats

Regularly preview and test your content across all intended output formats to ensure consistent rendering and user experience.

✓ Do: Use preview functions to check how content appears in web, mobile, PDF, and print formats before publishing
✗ Don't: Assume that content will render identically across all formats without testing and verification

Optimize Media Integration

Properly integrate images, videos, and other media elements to enhance content without compromising performance or accessibility.

✓ Do: Use appropriate file formats, alt text, and responsive sizing options available in the WYSIWYG editor
✗ Don't: Upload oversized images or media files without optimization, or forget to include accessibility attributes

Leverage Collaborative Features

Maximize the collaborative potential of WYSIWYG editors by using commenting, suggestion, and review features effectively.

✓ Do: Set up clear workflows for collaborative editing, including role-based permissions and structured review processes
✗ Don't: Allow unrestricted editing access without proper version control or review mechanisms in place

How Docsie Helps with WYSIWYG

Build Better Documentation with Docsie

Join thousands of teams creating outstanding documentation

Start Free Trial